On Writing
May 6th, 2012
One of the difficulties of writing in the Internet era is that there is so much to read and synthesize that the research part of the writing is now so much more difficult than the work required to complete the work of writing. This is a new thing. Certainly I had no problem all those years ago writing papers for school, college and work.
For those of you too young to recall, let me tell you a story of yore. In those benighted days before word processing software We would set down with a theme and a thesis, do research at a library (with books), and then drive right through the work of writing, editing, and delivering the product on paper to be typed for final copy. Now though in our modern day, with computerized writing tools, much of the editing and such-what is conducted during writing the first draft. Once that draft is done, the product of writing is actually not written, it is just a set of electrons set up and down just so, like pickets in a crazy new fence. Practicality forbids that the electrons be printed out and read through as in the olden day. All editing happens in the electronic world of Tron and electric motor bikes. Finally, and most disappointingly, there is no one to deliver the quivering mass of papers to be typed even if, in violation of every tree everywhere, the product of the writing had been printed out.
Today the research part of the problem is so much more complex. Yes, Wikipedia can get the atomic weight of a Barium nucleus in a trice. (Several isotopes from 114 to 153 with an observed weighted average of 137.327.) Also, the events of the second reign of Ethelred the Unready are readily available online. (He is distinguished by being King of England twice.) But that sort of factual look-up is what was readily available in the library even in days of yore. What to do with things that are more complex, like the 2.5 million web pages referring to Barry Goldwater? As one endeavors to write on such a subject, there is doubt. Does the next page, as yet unread, refute this hypothesis? How many more must be read? When is this research ever going to be done? Oh, where is my coffee? I just give up.
This is the part of the essay where a couple trite words of advise should be offered, but there is nothing trite to say about staring into the vastness of the Internet and considering if the hypothesis of the writing is worthy of being pursued. Little that can be written is new or can be verified as correct. What in fact is worthy of being written? Should you instead of writing, enjoy a summer’s day?